Admin meeting February 28th

[Stnglkabee]

Stng and Backpack were promoting back game play  Stng and backpack worked together to scam people. Backpack would log on for a minute or two to keep his title without timing out but not staying on long enough to be challenged. He worked with Stng to make it so Stng would scam people of money to "summon" Backpack so they could accumulate innocent people's money. This is not how the game-play should be. That is why it's bad-game play. If they did not know that scamming people is bad, then that is their malfunction, not ours. That is why we are using Rule 8. Are they breaking a rule? No. Are they promoting bad game play? Yes.

2 HE DID NOT BREAK A RULE BY CHARGING MONEY FFS HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY THIS

It wasnt a scam if you take your car in to get repaired and you dont pay, you dont get your car back. I had a legit service i was offering.


Also bpc has no issues before this so why is he punished the same as me with no previous problems?

[alexandred3]

thats cute

Back to you:

I'm not sure when you became someone who deserved all these answers for something that

Everyone is entitled to knowing the reasons for admin actions.

[oddy]

No problem, everyone is entitled to knowing the reasons for admin actions. I'm not here to judge you; we all have opinions. I'll happily discuss anything with you and if you present a good enough argument, I would have no problem reversing the actions we did. But I stand strong on my opinion as of now.

this is where you and I differ, I feel something that affects 1 or 2 players only needs to be explained to those people who are affected by it, a server wide affect I agree everyone has the right to know, but I'm a believer in people minding their own damn business

[Paradox]

It wasnt a scam if you take your car in to get repaired and you dont pay, you dont get your car back. I had a legit service i was offering.


Also bpc has no issues before this so why is he punished the same as me with no previous problems?

Making analogies does not act as an argument. I make an analogy to support my side. You were offering a service that forced bad gameplay. That's bad.


The punishments seemed the most reasonable for both sides. In my opinion, it wasn't based on previous reasoning. Admins have different reasoning.

[Stnglkabee]

One more thing, what proves anything about when i told bpc when to get on what says i even did?

[Mariofighter3]

 


1. That picture about fuck democracy was more a satire about this servers being a dictature suppressing chosen members.

[Pichu]

shut the fuck up

[Pichu]

every single one of you

[Tenebrae]

Holy Heaven, let the drama begin.

Was waiting for this to happen...

[Stnglkabee]

What proves anything about when i told bpc when to get on what says i even did?

[hobo4chompy]

If i may step in i did see plenty of times when Archie logged in Backpack Always Logged out

[Frenzy_Monkey47]

Why was jotr banned >:I

[1cec0ld]

Why was jotr banned >:I

Reread the post, he was demoted, not banned.

[Paradox]

One more thing, what proves anything about when i told bpc when to get on what says i even did?

We have multiple members, moderators and admins and, as far as I am aware, logchats of you doing this. You also literally just stated a few posts ago:

I had a legit service i was offering.

 


Not only can multiple people attest to this but you admitted to it. Stop wasting my time.

[Mariofighter3]

Not only can multiple people attest to this but you admitted to it. Stop wasting my time.

If you want him to stop wasting your time, ban the man already. There's no benefit to keeping him around. Why bother when you know he'll just screw up again and end up in a spot like this again?